🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in Russian state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. It has threatened retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a severe assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia may attempt to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are working on measures to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a clear signal that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."